Humour by repetition

Hello,

  the second of no more or many more rememberances from the fuzzy haze of my employment on Joiner street in the 1990s.

Following a recommendation from myself (see Morning John post), my friend not Mark was employed with us doing packing and picking of exam papers. One regular employee was not Paul, who wasn't a sculptor and didn't live in Dronfield. Hopefully the word not will prevent anyone from identifying themselves or others in this post.....

Paul, sorry, not Paul, was a rather serious individual. Not Mark was a rather jolly chap with a determination to wind people up, at any length. He also possessed the world's most annoying high pitched and very loud laugh. If one, say, not Paul, was already annoyed by his wind ups, then his laughing at the same would hugely exacerbate the affects.

One day Paul* confided in us, for reason that given the above are unclear, that he was having issues with his latest sculpture. Mark** laughed. Paul was immediately annoyed and noticeably disappointed, and stated that he knew he shouldn't have tried to confide in us about his calling ( I made the last two words up....). I tried to assuage his discomfort with supportive mumblings but he said he didn't want to talk about it because Mark would laugh. Mark insisted this was not the case. And so it began...

M: "Paul, go on mate, tell us about your sculpture"
P " No, I already said no"
M "Goo on mate"
P " No"
M " Goo onnnnn"
P "No"
M "why not?"
P " because you'll laugh"
M "I wont".
P "You will"
M " Paul, mate, I wont"
P "You will"
M " I promise I wont....."
Ten minutes later.....

M "Goo on Paul, tell us"
P "NO!"

Myself and Mark had often talked about how immature and yet simultaneously amusing humour by repetition was. Taking this on board, Mark began a three month campaign of repeated queries about the nature or even name of Paul's sculpture. Every time Paul would steadfastly refuse to divulge any details about his handiwork.

Eventually, in the last week of his stint (we only worked until September in the main) and after having been asked approximately a thousand times in the preceding months, Mark asked Paul what the sculpture was of, about and called. Having asked Mark three times for his assurance that he wouldn't laugh, Paul decided to finally off load.

The thing is, after such a long time I can't remember what Paul said. I think he started by saying "It represents" and he went on to provide a reasonable, cogent, non outlandish description of its form and meaning.

I looked at Mark.

He laughed.

The loudest, highest pitched, most exaggerated laugh you have ever heard. For about ten minutes. With tears rolling down his face. And our colleagues also laughed.

Paul nearly laughed as well, before his serious face intensified and he looked down at the table in front of him, slowly shaking his head after a long, despairing sigh.

Its tribute to the overwhelming sad hilarity of Mark's persistence that I remember that, only, and not a word of Paul's painfully extricated admittance of inspiration or sculptured meaning. This was a victory for the power of repetition, and an event which sadly may have made Paul question the meaning of his work to the extent that he simply stopped creating claymotions. I genuinely hope that is not the case.

As much as I genuinely also hope that Paul now looks back on that moment with at least a wry smile.

Yannis



*Not
**Not